The Endicott Enquirer News from the Southern Tier

12Sep/090

From the Herald Mail Letters – Don’t Brainwash Our Kids! Signed the TEA Party

Thanks to school system for not showing speech

To the editor:

The Hagerstown TEA Party thanks Washington County Public Schools Superintendent Elizabeth Morgan and the school system for listening to parents and for providing a common-sense solution regarding Tuesday's speech to students by President Obama.

With this decision, the school system empowered parents to make decisions regarding whether or not their children would view the president's speech. This decision allowed parents to watch the program with their children and have a healthy discussion afterward.

Red flags regarding the speech appeared when the press found out the U.S. Board of Education was asking students to "write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the President." Workbooks and activities have since been modified to remove objectionable content. We are thankful this partisan politicization has been exposed and removed from the U.S. Board of Education's curriculum guidelines.

Locally, the superintendent of schools has made the right decision to not politicize the school system by airing President Obama's speech live. It appears the school system just learned about the speech on Thursday. Morgan has used caution and wisdom rather than bowing to political pressure to air the broadcast.

The school system has appropriately listened to the parents that they serve and said "no" to unfettered access to Washington County's most precious resource, our students. This type of unfettered access to school students would set the nation's school system on a very slippery slope. The temptation for a president to politicize the school system to achieve political goals may prove too great to overcome. We are thankful and proud to know that our school system will not be participating in this activity.

Neil Parrott
Hagerstown TEA Party

Are you kidding me? How can I respect someones opinion on a matter that clearly is already so biased towards one side of the political spectrum that there is no point in even trying to reason with them? Do I need to remind them that George H. W. Bush did exactly the same thing and no one was running around claiming that it was going to corrupt our children. Nope, when the true red Republicans do this stuff they can do no wrong...

Clearly this opinion is not based on the content of the address, but on the politics of the writer. Our children deserve to hear from our national leaders, the deserve to know that the entire country is working for their future and that it is important for them to work hard. The only reason the school board didn't air the speech is because they have a weak stomach for people like Neil who writes into the Herald-Mail to rail against something that he really doesn't have much interest in other than that he is a Republican and the President is a Democrat.

If this country is to the point where people censor the president's speeches at the local level then we truly have entered a era of political upheaval. Personally, you respect the office that the President holds, I trust him to not do something stupid when talking to my kids and I think it is important that they understand he wants them to do well. I am ashamed of the weak willed folks at the school board that shut the access to a speech by our president, the leader of our country, the man or woman who we are all supposed to look up to and respect for who they are and what they represent.

30Aug/090

Woman Compares Obama to a Nazi? What???

It's not often that I agree with Barney Frank, but I have to agree with him here, it amazes me that people have the ability to get up in front of a group and make a complete fool out of themselves without even worrying about it. How can you compare Obama to the Nazis? They are complete polar opposites, the Nazi party was about exclusion and the whole basis of Obama's platform is about inclusion. You want to compare his policies to the socialists? OK, at least you have some potential common ground there (even though he really isn't much of a socialist in reality). Watch this video of a woman compare Obama to the Nazis and listen to Barney Frank's response, it's classic.

2Mar/090

Consider Yourself Rickroll’d

If you watched the video above, you have been Rickroll'd. That is all.

20Jan/090

Yet Another Data Breach at a Transaction Processor

A data breach last year at Princeton, N.J., payment processor Heartland Payment Systems may have compromised tens of millions of credit and debit card transactions, the company said today.

If accurate, such figures may make the Heartland incident one of the largest data breaches ever reported.

Robert Baldwin, Heartland's president and chief financial officer, said the company, which processes payments for more than 250,000 businesses, began receiving fraudulent activity reports late last year from MasterCard and Visa on cards that had all been used at merchants which rely on Heartland to process payments.

Baldwin said 40 percent of transactions the company processes are from small to mid-sized restaurants across the country. He declined to name any well-known establishments or retail clients that may have been affected by the breach.

Source: Washington Post

How many more times will this happen before we start seeing significant improvements in the security at transaction processing companies? The fact that this is such a matter-of-fact, response that shows no sign of caring about the people affected is disturbing. As consumers we can no longer afford to simply stand by and watch our personal financial information be stolen and not do anything about it. I think it is time we demand these corporations prove they protect clients data as best they can or otherwise they should not be allowed to operate.

Working in the financial industry myself and in the IT field to boot, it stirkes me as incredibly incompetent that a company would not employ enough safeguards on their networks to deter these types of attacks. It would also make sense that they would force their clients to adhere to the same standards so that they do not have any one weak point in their wider network of operations. Take processing credit cards with Visa for example, where you must go through a rigorus certification program before they will even let you touch their network or data. If you do not do this then you simply don't get to use their service plain and simple.

Not only is the company not really taking any responsibility but they also are announcing this on a day where it will get no news coverage which I don't think is a coincidence at all. They are knowingly trying to avoid telling the public about the potential for their information to have been stolen. A plainly sleazy move that should be investigated by government regulators if you ask me as it is reckless and irresponsible of them to take this type of action. Keep your eyes on your credit card statements folks, you never know where this will go next.

8Nov/080

2008 Mummers Parade – A Family Event?

I saw this in Mail Call today:

“I was calling to just let everybody know that I thought the Mummers Parade was one of the best that I’ve seen in probably the last 10 years.”

— Hagerstown

No Offense to anyone who really liked this parade this year, but the crowd that turned out for it was not something I would let my kids come out to. Constant swearing and vulgar comments. Hearing grown men and fathers talk about how they would have loved to knock someone out on their front porch while their kids are around?

Sorry Hagerstown, but you still have a lot of cleaning up to do before I consider these events worthwhile going to.


18Oct/080

"Pro-America?" Sarah Palin Thinks All People From Cities are Anti-American

Once again Sarah Palin opened her mouth and something stupid came out:

"We believe that the best of America is in the small towns that we get to visit, and in the wonderful little pockets of what I call the real America, being here with all of you hard-working, very patriotic, very pro-America areas of this great nation,"

What can I say other than, you will never be more pro-American than me Sarah and I would never vote for you. You're the one that has done questionable things while being an elected official, a position that people in America trusted that you would perform ethically in. Unfortunately your idea of "pro-America" equates to those people that want to have you elected which is a minority of the country. Your ideas are radical, you clearly don't have any tolerance for people that don't think like you and you have not performed very well throughout your political career. All things that I think are not pro-American.

America was actually founded on immigrants, otherwise know as including others, which apparently most conservatives can't seem to remember. How many of their families came from Europe in the late 19th and early 20th centuries? Now because a new generation wants to make their way to America from places where people don't look like us, we don't want to let them in our country. Let's cut through all of the "they're taking our jobs" garbage and boil it down to what it mostly is - prejudice.

Then we have all of the educated and upward moving folks in cities that understand this. The people that you are implying are not "pro-American." I'm sorry I have a good job and an education and can see through crap being slung by the republican party this election. I'm sorry I know that a lot of people will be severely more at risk with a John McCain health care plan. I'm sorry if I see that the so called "war" in Iraq and Afghanistan can't be won by our brave soldiers because it is now a war of ideologies without true objectives from the top. I'm sorry if I happen to think that the wealthiest in America should pay proportionately more in taxes than the poorest people. But you know what? None of these things make me "anti-American" We are all Allowed under the American constitution to say and speak what we feel, a principle that makes this country what it is. Just because I don't agree with you does not mean that I do not love my country.

My love for my country will be expressed in my vote this November when I vote for Barack Obama.

1Oct/081

Palin: Apparently Tough Questions Constitute a Lack of Ethics

Asked Tuesday by radio host Hugh Hewitt if she agreed that interviews with ABC's Charles Gibson and CBS' Couric were designed to embarrass her, Palin replied: "Well, I have a degree in journalism also, so it surprises me that so much has changed since I received my education in journalistic ethics all those years ago."

Source: AP

Apparently tough questions constitute a lack of ethics when the person being asked can't effectively answer them. At least that is Sarah Palin's definition of ethics as it pertains to journalism. What I find even more amusing is that she admits to having a degree in journalism in her comment to Mr. Hewitt. If I had fumbled so embarrassingly during an interview with CBS I would not come right back and say that I have a degree in the field. All this means is that she should have known what was going to happen if she has a background on how interviews work. I would argue that as a journalist, ethically you should ask the tough questions that need to be asked, if it proves the other person is incompetent in the process than so be it, that is not an ethical concern of the interviewer.

It's no wonder that the McCain campaign has kept this woman so sheltered from interviews and it appears they should keep doing so. All she has done so far is proven that she can't hold her own in the face of any tough questioning. Don't people think that this might prevent her from being a good leader? After all, the president and vice president positions are probably two of the most stressful jobs anyone can hold. Biden may be long winded, but at least he can answer a question intelligently without amounting to what eff3ectively is taking the 5th during an interview.

Obviously I don't support the McCain campaign, but I still have respect for the Senator. Unfortunately Sarah Palin has done absolutely nothing to earn any respect in my book and will unlikely be able to do so in the next month, especially with her track record so far.

19Sep/080

Washington County Teaches Kids that Division by Zero Produces Meaningful Result

So for dividing by zero — what if there are 10 apples to be distributed, but no one comes to the table? How many apples does each "person" at the table receive? The question itself is meaningless — each "person" can't receive zero, or 10, or an infinite number of apples for that matter, because there are simply no people to receive anything in the first place. So \textstyle\frac{10}{0}, at least in elementary arithmetic, is said to be meaningless, or undefined.

So rumor has it that the Washington County Board of Education is looking to teach our children how to divide by zero. Interesting when you consider that the result is undefined in real number mathematics. As a matter of fact if my sources are correct, they are teaching your kids that if you divide by 10 by 0 then the answer is 10. If you are confused, angry and think the genius who came up with this ought to be fired then I would suggest you begin talking to your childrens' teachers to make sure this is not being taught to your them.

It is important for parents to demand that their kids get a quality education and teaching this kind of false information and plainly absurd notion is going to confuse students when they actually get a teacher that knows better. Start looking at your elementary age childrens' home work and ensure that this is not being taught, if it is find out why and how to stop it.

If you concerned that this is the case please contact the WCBOE at http://www.wcboe.k12.md.us/content/pi_contact.cfm

2Sep/081

Anti-abortion group says Palin ‘walks her talk’ – CNN.com

"She's made some tough and courageous decisions and has not shied away from following her beliefs," she told CNN in a phone interview. "It's plausible a politician in a similar situation could have hidden the pregnancy."

Anti-abortion group says Palin 'walks her talk' - CNN.com.

OK, so once again we have a right-wing conservative group that thinks that Palin did the right thing by coming forward about her daughter's pregnancy. But no one is stating the obvious, that it would have been political suicide to not do so. She had two options, cover it up and let the rumors swirl around that the 3-moth old was actually her daughter's baby or announce the truth that while it wasn't her daughter's baby she was going to have one.

Even after she takes this step to just stop the rumor mill, it is not like her so called "pro-life" stance on this issue is a big shocker. What is she going to do, tell her daughter to get an abortion and really flush her chances of becoming VP down the toilet? I don't think so. She is going to flip-flop on the issue just like McCain has on just about every moderate stance he has ever held and claim that she is encouraging her daughter to have the baby because of her pro-life stance and that she is proud to be a grandparent. The funny thing here is that these conservatives behave no differently than anyone else that has to cover their butts in these situations. They take a fundamental stance that they have on birth control, abstinence and sex education and then marginalize it so they can emphasize the pro-life aspects of what really can be chalked up to a complete lack of common sense and likely bad parenting. I hate to tell everyone, but there are not many people that would be happy to see their 17 year old pregnant and unmarried. There is no doubt in my mind that the Palins are not happy either and are just trying to do damage control as the McCain campaign begins to wonder why they picked this woman.

This incident is just one of a series that proves the complete absurdity of the stance conservatives take on sex education and birth control. If they could come out from the fog that clearly seems to be clouding their thinking, they would clearly see that if they just educated their children a bit about basic human reproduction, then this would not be a big issue. So I leave it up to you to decide which it is, an inability to just see through to a clear solution to a simple problem or Sarah Palin's daughter really just doesn't have any common sense and she severly screwed up in an age where every teen should understand what sex actually is for biologically.

1Sep/080

John McCain Sure Knows How to Pick a Vice President

So John McCain needed to pick someone that offset his age to ensure people felt like there was continuity plan for the presidency. Unfortunately, he picked a corrup governor from Alaska with daughters that appear to be trying to match Jamie Lynn Spears for teen pregnancies.

Both Bloomberg and the AP are already running stories about how Sarah Palin's own supporters are saying she in unqiuallified for the job. I especially love the CNN story about her daughter's pregnancy and how they are so happy she is going to have the baby and become grandparents. Whatever. No one goes to their 17 year old daughter and says "I'm so proud of you for having a baby even though you are unmarried, clearly have no common sense and we are going to be grandparents at 45!" The fact is that now she has put McCain in a tight spot already since apparently the uber-conservative right doesn't teach the abstinence only method very well at all and now his vice president's daughter has gone and gotten herself pregnant at 17. Yep, things are starting off well for the GOP in this race already.

Now I am just waiting for the connections between her and Ted Stevens to be reported on and she really will become the dead weight that she clearly appears to be. Honestly, what the heck was John McCain thinking when he did this? I don't think this is quite as brilliant as some conservative pundits were saying if you ask me.